|
The AKC should have high standards. They should be open for scutiny by those that give credits to organisations, businesses and companies for Best Practices. If AKC are in the food line they should be producing food up to the quality that its members would expect. If AKC (the food) is up to the standard of Hills Science and is AAFCO-approved then members should be satisfied that their organistaion is achieving an acceptable standard in that regard. But I don't agree (and the NZKC agrees with me) that a national canine association should be involved in producing dog food unless there was an absolute situation where no decent choice existed.
|