This is a discussion on An accidental very hard bite within the General Corgi Discussions forums, part of the General category; This is really one of the most amusing threads that's been on Go Corgi. Take all ther serious bits ...
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#31 (permalink) |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Silverstream (near Wellington, the capital of NZ)
Posts: 5,055
|
This is really one of the most amusing threads that's been on Go Corgi. Take all ther serious bits out, and it's as funny as anything.
A Corgi excitedly grabbing mail as it comes through a door slot and he also grabs a couple of fingers that are still stuck to a person's hand. That Corgi wants the mail delivered. But then we have another Corgi who doesn't want the mail delivered to his house so he pushes it back outside and plays letter ping pong with the postie. I think the outcome will be that you pay the medical expenses and the matter will be dropped - and it won't happen again simply because you have taken other measures. Whether posites are trained or not re placing letters in front door mail slots, in reality they do what they are advised not to because they don't want to muck around fiddling with mail at every front door. In law, I couldn't imagine many countries, if any, making it illegal for a mail deliverer to poke a finger or two or even a whole set of fingers through a mail slot into a house for purposes of delivering the household's mail. One of the stories in my book Amazing Dog Stories, is about a German Shepherd named Harley Jnr who could delicately open envelopes and parcels without damaging the letters or contents. Last edited by Michael Romanos; 12-30-2006 at 12:30 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 (permalink) | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 165
|
Quote:
This may only apply to my state. And I could be wrong, I'm not a lawyer. Here's my opinion.... There is no difference by law where I live between an accidental bite and an intentional bite. In a court you can't prove you know what was going on in the dog's mind at the time. The intent of the law is to prevent injuries. The second bite allows procedings to start to have the dog labeled as a vicious dog. Then the rules and penalties are different and more strict, ultimatly the dog can be put down. There is a committe created to do this. To understand go to the link from corgimom and read the laws for Rhode Island. It still may not apply to you. It's too much to post here but the link explains. Thanks again for the great link corgimom. It's pretty hard to get a lawyer to take your case when you can't collect damages unless the dog was outside and off my property. It sounds to me as if the law is designed that way because if you stick your fingers in my fence or my house and my dog bites you you're an idiot! If your Corgi grabs the mail coming in a mail slot for any reason, you should seal your mail slot and get a mailbox. If your laws are the same as mine and your dog accidentally bites three times, your dog's life is in danger, you can go to prison, and be fined. The intent of the dog is not relevant to the law. Even though we both know it was an accident, in my state a dog will be put down for enough bites, blame is on the owner as it should be. It cost me less than $30 and a couple of hours to seal the slot and install a mailbox on the outside wall. The color of the box matches my house perfectly. I think the law means... If one lets the dog keep biting people somehow, you're an idiot! After the first bite, fix the problem. Quote:
As usual human nature takes over. The USA post office trains workers very carefully not to stick the fingers into anything including the door! So of course the fast efficent posties all over the world do it anyway and probably get a pat on the back for being done so quickly! It's not illegal here, but you the law does not award you damages becuse you stuck your finger in my house, or a hole in my fence. I agree it probably is over, but it is sad that the woman was hurt no matter what, if things were different she would be greeting Bailey every day and getting a kiss. It still may happen some day, who knows. And it is very sad that some may now consider Bailey dangerous. The reality is that if I did nothing, another carrier could get hurt, this woman was really hurt! That would make me an idiot !!!
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 1,024
|
A friend of ours whose dog grabbed a child out of playfulness had a professional dog behaviorist go to bat for them per se in "court". They had a muzzle order put against the dog and were fighting it. While they agreed it was dangerous that their dog grabbed the child with it's mouth, it wasn't an agressive dog. The behaviorist convinced the "judge" that it wasn't agression and the dog didn't have to wear the muzzle. It just wasn't to be off leash near people - as he has a chase instinct, and is a very large breed that could accidently hurt someone else.
My long winded point is you may want to bring in a behaviorist - if this progresses.
__________________
Deb Toronto, ON, Canada Rupert Jemma
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 420
|
I just read this for the first time (I am at my mom's house with limited computer time). I am sorry that you and Bailey are having to go through this - and I hope it doesn't progress beyond medical bills.
__________________
Tana, Rhys, and Andy Rhys's Dogster Page: http://www.dogster.com/pet_page.php?i=303513&j=t Andy's Dogster Page:http://www.dogster.com/pet_page.php?i=397513&j=t |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| accidental, bite, hard |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|